<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sound Acoustics &#187; In the Studio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/category/blog/in-the-studio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content</link>
	<description>Acoustic  Products Specialists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:06:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vocal Booth on the cheap!</title>
		<link>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/04/vocal-booth-on-the-cheap/</link>
		<comments>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/04/vocal-booth-on-the-cheap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get lots of questions about vocal booths, and the solutions are either expensive or a lot of work. If you need a quick and dirty vocal booth, this BT270-600 pressure zone trap configuration works great. The staple gun channels are what makes this possible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get lots of questions about vocal booths, and the solutions are either expensive or a lot of work. If you need a quick and dirty vocal booth, this BT270-600 pressure zone trap configuration works great. The staple gun channels are what makes this possible.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-461 alignnone" title="BT270-600VocalBooth2s450" src="http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/BT270-600VocalBooth2s450.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="376" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/04/vocal-booth-on-the-cheap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mick Wordley talks about Ribbon mics</title>
		<link>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/03/mick-wordley-talks-about-ribbon-mics/</link>
		<comments>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/03/mick-wordley-talks-about-ribbon-mics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio technology acoustics ribbon mics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I&#8217;ve been mucking around with low end ribbon mics, which definitely offer a different sonic texture. I few years back I did some recording at Mick Wordley&#8217;s studio in Adelaide, and had the opportunity of using some great vintage mics and pres. I found this video on the Audio Technology site, and features Mick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;ve been mucking around with low end ribbon mics, which definitely offer a different sonic texture. I few years back I did some recording at Mick Wordley&#8217;s studio in Adelaide, and had the opportunity of using some great vintage mics and pres. I found this video on the Audio Technology site, and features Mick offering some great insights into classic gear.<br />
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oLxdihbIzt8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oLxdihbIzt8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/03/mick-wordley-talks-about-ribbon-mics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap Ribbon mics</title>
		<link>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/03/cheap-ribbon-mics/</link>
		<comments>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/03/cheap-ribbon-mics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been trying some of the cheaper ribbon mikes from China (Cascade Fathead, Apex 210) and I like them. Maybe not as accurate as a Royer but they do give you another useful flavor. The Apex 210 must have had a few knocks in transit as the ribbon had sagged a fair bit (think Sydney [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying some of the cheaper ribbon mikes from China (Cascade Fathead, Apex 210) and I like them. Maybe not as accurate as a Royer but they do give you another useful flavor. The Apex 210 must have had a few knocks in transit as the ribbon had sagged a fair bit (think Sydney Opera House). I had a go at tightening it up and managed to do so without tearing it, but it&#8217;s pretty much pot luck in regards to the set up. It sounds much better than it did, but probably shy of factory spec! Just need a pre with lots of clean gain with ribbon mics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2010/03/cheap-ribbon-mics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gear panic!?</title>
		<link>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2009/06/gear-panic/</link>
		<comments>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2009/06/gear-panic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone else suffer from gear performance anxiety? Like us all, I get lots of emails regarding performance in the sack (the bedroom that is), but really, its the performance of my gear in the rack that keeps me awake at night. I was scouring the forums to get a few opinions on my Protools [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else suffer from gear performance anxiety? Like us all, I get lots of emails regarding performance in the sack (the bedroom that is), but really, its the performance of my gear in the rack that keeps me awake at night. I was scouring the forums to get a few opinions on my Protools 96 interface, and how it compared to the 192.  Many opinions of the 96 rate it as barely better than a 002! So, is it time to panic? Are all those recordings I have done substandard? Have I sabotaged a hit single along the way? Could I have had fame and glory, only to be cut off at the knees by some dodgy converters? Hmmm&#8230;.I&#8217;m not so sure that is the case. Sure, now I want a 192, but I have recorded some very nice drums even with a Digi 001. I even didn&#8217;t mind the Audiomedia 111 card. So, in the general scheme of things, how would you rate the following in terms of importance.<br />
The artist. The song. The producer. The mix. The recording gear. (I&#8217;ve lumped a few factors together here).<br />
<img src="http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/96pic.jpg" alt="96pic" title="96pic" width="520" height="258" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-352" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://soundacoustics.com.au/Content/2009/06/gear-panic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
